Men's Philadelphia Eagles Pro Line Charcoal Taylor Tri-Blend T-Shirt,Philadelphia Eagles 8x8 White Team Logo Decal,Mens Oakland Raiders Marcus Allen Pro Line Black Retired Player Jersey Wholesale Los Angeles Rams Jerseys Outlet.Men's Oakland Raiders Nike White Facility T-Shirt,Women's Chicago Bears Concepts Sport Navy Fa?ade All Over Print Robe Cheap Los Angeles Rams Jerseys NFL.Mens Chicago Bears Pro Line Navy Blue Solace Slub Hooded Sweatshirt,Drew Brees New Orleans Saints Control the Clock T-Shirt - Charcoal.Mens Detroit Lions Ash Big & Tall Squib Kick Pullover Hoodie,Mens Cincinnati Bengals Nike Charcoal Sweatless Jacket.New York Jets Tervis 16oz. Sequin Tumbler with Lid,Philadelphia Eagles Pink Mesh Dog Jersey 2016 Cheap St Louis Rams Gear Jerseys Sale.Men's Tampa Bay Buccaneers New Era White/Heathered Grey Tech Stir 39THIRTY Flex Hat,Youth Tampa Bay Buccaneers Red Unbreakable Flex Pullover Hoodie's Detroit Lions Majestic Charcoal Heart & Soul III T-Shirt,Nike San Francisco 49ers Women's Everyday Legend V-Neck Performance T-Shirt - Scarlet,Men's Carolina Panthers Antigua Black Century Polo.New Orleans Saints Mirror With Color Letters License Plate Frame --,New York Jets The Northwest Company 28" X 58" Beach Towel,Women's San Diego Chargers Cuce Navy Sideliner Sweatshirt Todd Gurley Of The St. Louis Rams

The Beginning of a Lawsuit
The End of a Partnership

Toward the end of 1930, at which point Frankart Inc. had become a very well known and financially successful company, Arthur Von Frankenberg had become disenchanted with a prior arrangement he had made with his partners Henry Underberg and George Murad. Although Von Frankenberg had always owned the majority of the shares in the corporation since its inception, he had (strangely) agreed to a stipulation that split all profits equally among the three partners and that each received only one vote, regardless of the number of shares owned.

He wrote the following letter in December of 1930.

33 West 67th St.,
New York City

December 12, 1930

Mr. Henry Underberg,
c/o Frankart, Inc
225 Fifth Ave.,
New York City

Dear Mr. Underberg:

As you know, I have been dissatisfied with the arrangement between yourself, Mr. Murad and myself as embodied in the paper which we three signed dated August 31, 1925, and its subsequent modifications. Frankart, Inc. depends upon me for the designs of the articles for which it sells. I own three-fifths of the capital stock and yet am limited to one-third of the profits of the business which spring entirely from my creative work notwithstanding that under the laws of this state I am, as the principal stockholder, entitled to dividends upon my stockholding. I have been advised that there is some doubt as to the validity of the agreement. In any event, I wish to notify you that after the close of the fiscal year on December 31, 1930, I shall make other arrangements for the manufacture and sale of articles produced from my designs unless before that date the agreement in question shall be completely done away with and another providing for a distribution of the profits in harmony with the law of this state, be entered into. Although my ideas of the new arrangement are not finally formulated I am inclined to believe that Frankart, Inc., as a corporation, should enter into a proper contract with me for the production of designs, with a manufacturer for the manufacture of the articles in accordance with the designs, and with a manager and salesman for taking care of the business and distribution of the manufactured articles. All of the profits of the business properly belong to Frankart, Inc, and should be distributed among its stockholders in accordance with the law of this state, and the corporation itself should be governed by a board of directors elected by the stockholders in accordance with the provisions of this state. I am sending an identical letter to Mr. Murad and will be glad to receive a prompt reply.

Yours very truly,

Henry Underberg and George Murad joined forces in a legal case to prevent Von Frankenberg from potentially creating a new Board of Directors under his control. The case went to the New York State Supreme Court. Von Frankenberg ultimately lost in 1931.

More on this in my self-published book due out by the end of 2013.

Back to Top . . . Contact Me . . . News . . . For Sale

main menu